Footnote #: 108
Refers to Dialogue: “What he called quackery”
Time: 00:15:59
Truth Value:

Another tricky edit. Professor Seaholm isn’t saying anything here she didn’t really say in our interview; it’s just that contextually, the editing strongly implies she is “on Brinkley’s side” against Fishbein. In our interview, Professor Seaholm was sometimes critical of Fishbein, but not his activities against Brinkley and other actual quacks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *